Nothing beats being dragooned into decency

random-acts-of-kindness

Call me Scrooge, Grinch, Mr. Heat Miser or whatever other holiday-related term of derision you like, but I long ago had my fill of such amorphous concepts as “paying it forward,” “giving back” and the always-inane “random acts of kindness.”

The above actions celebrate that which was once recognized as simple decency.

But in today’s world, where the navel-gazer is king, it’s not enough to be good to one another: Lack of recognition would almost appear to invalidate civility in the eyes of many.

First, the terms “pay it forward” and “give back,” logically speaking, make little sense.

You can’t pay something forward.  You can do something nice for someone without them knowing it – but, of course, if you crow about it, you’re really just serving your own purposes.

And “giving back” implies that you took something in the first place. Athletes, entertainers and corporate bigwigs like to throw around the term “giving back,” particularly when visiting their old stomping grounds.

Unless they had their athletic, entertainment or business talents conferred upon them, like royalty bequeathing a title on a noble, they probably had to work very hard over many years to reach their level of accomplishment.

A multi-millionaire football player, for example, likely spent thousands of hours lifting weights, running sprints and getting pounded on the practice field over the course of 20-plus years in order to earn the sum which now sits in his bank account.

If he wants to help others, great; but he doesn’t owe it to anyone to “give back.”

A friend writes much more eloquently of the odiousness of the concept of “giving back” in a piece in today’s Wall Street Journal (subscription required):

You can’t avoid the giving-back phenomenon, even when Christmas shopping online. Companies now routinely advertise their sense of ‘responsibility’ by offering customers ways to ‘give back’ – so instead of buying stuff like a soulless materialist wretch (to be handed over to your equally materialist friends or family), you can also give a dollar for breast-cancer research or animal rescue.

You’ll temporarily feel better about yourself, and the company gets credit for its humanitarian values, so everybody wins. But if you choose to ignore the silly ‘give back’ icon and move ahead with your purchase, you’ve got another tiny reason to feel morally inferior.

Maybe it’s all for the good, but I do wonder about the sheer smallness of much of it. A local radio show I heard recently brought in an ‘expert’ in giving back. Her counsel: If you can’t afford to donate money, try giving back in ‘little ways’ – such as grabbing a shopping cart on your way into the supermarket so the bag boy won’t have to do it. How strange that in our post-religious society, simple errands become fraught with notions of guilt and righteousness.

My friend included perhaps the most sanctimonious example of “giving back” that I’ve come across in a long, long time in his Journal piece. Not surprisingly, it’s from a politician, our state’s chief executive. He writes:

“I (recently) received a news release announcing a ‘Christmas Challenge’ issued by my state’s governor. ‘I want to challenge each and every family to do one random act of kindness,’ Gov. Nikki Haley wrote. ‘Whether it’s having a soldier for dinner because they (sic) don’t have a family nearby to go to, visiting a nursing home, or baking cookies for an elderly neighbor, each act of kindness can help affect our state for the better. If every family in South Carolina commits to doing this, we would have 5 million kind acts across our state. How special would that be?’”

Speaking of special, here’s a couple of things that would make my day:

One, that my governor understood her state has 5 million residents, rather than 5 million families; and

Two, that the populace as a whole might be willing, for even a short time, to go about their lives without looking to be patted on the back and having their praises sung to the high heavens for doing what, a couple of generations ago, would have been considered nothing more than common courtesy.

(Top: A random act of kindness. Unfortunately, the plant needed water and died soon after the well-intentioned but dim-witted soul left.)

Advertisements

14 thoughts on “Nothing beats being dragooned into decency

  1. OK CBC
    This was absolute solid gold. You had me laughing out loud from the beginning. I especialy lost it when you said, “You can’t avoid the giving-back phenomenon”.

    Thank you for this. I work in retail and this was timed very well for me after the day I had today.

    • Oh, I can only image the special hell you have to go through at this time of year, Tom. And I don’t imagine shoppers are showing you much in the way of the inane concepts of “giving back” or “paying it forward,” even if r management is telling you how important it is to keep a smile on your face.

  2. This posting reminds me of why you be one of my favorite, must-read bjawgers. A tad cranky but still engaging and maybe wise beyond whatever your years are since you don’t reveal much about your own self and I like that lack of narcisstic stain that I have my own self and is a national disorder probably by now. I will strive to be more like you in ’14! Merry Christmas and Happy Holidays, too, Boller!

    • Much obliged, Rev. I’m not sure if I’m old enough to qualify for curmudgeon status, but I’m likely on my way. I’d like to think when I do reach that level, I won’t be curmudgeonly simply for the sake of it, but with some goal, misguided or otherwise, in mind.

      And I hope you, too, have a Merry Christmas and a Happy Holiday season. I appreciate your readership and comments. Take care.

  3. Don’t you think it’s just part of today’s somewhat dumb society of needing to give trendy names to everything? It’s not that pay it forward hasn’t been happening, it’s just not been called that. eg, we would have said, I’ll help someone if they are stuck and maybe one day someone will help me.

    When we’ve helped people in the past, in whatever way, they’ve usually given us something back – cards, bottles of wine, flowers, the usual sort of appreciative gift. It’s not necessary but it is nice that a gesture has been appreciated whether it is cleaning someone’s spark plugs, feeding their animals when they are on holiday, or lending some tools/materials.

    I do write about my generous Spanish neighbours but we live together in a happy atmosphere of reciprocity. Not just at Christmas though, it’s all year round, and that to me is what is important. Doing one good deed once a year isn’t exactly earth-shattering.

    • Your last sentence is spot-on. Anyone can do a good deed once a year. Being a decent person entails acting decent the whole year round – and not expecting a parade every time you hold the door for someone.

      You’re right: People having been doing this for one another for centuries, just without the inane feel-good names and self-serving attitude.

      I suppose the difference is that what you have in your area is still a genuine community, rather than one that is simply an amalgamation of people that tries to cobble itself together through when it suits its needs.

  4. A super post…thank you.

    It’s about making people feel good about themselves – as if they don’t feel good about themselves enough as it is….in the hope that they will have an attachment – future sales, future votes – to the institution or person giving them this opportunity.

    It stinks.

    Our friends and neighbours help us and we help them…
    I’ll give to a charity that really is a charity and not an income producer for its top brass and the politicians they pay, even if that charity is a couple of people without any legal status doing something to improve the lives of humans or animals….

    But I don’t need a pat on the back for doing what I was brought up to think of as normal…and I’m very suspicious of the motives of those who try to do so.

    • Amen. If you need a pat on the back for doing something good for someone else, than you’ve got. as they say “issues.” I’m like you – if I choose to do something for someone else, I do it because I want to and solely to help others, and I am very wary of those who need to beat their breasts about their generous nature.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s