An English archaeologist claims that humans – not rats, as has long been believed – spread the plague that ravaged London in the mid-14th century.
“The evidence just isn’t there to support it,” Barney Sloane, author of ‘The Black Death in London,’ told The Telegraph. “We ought to be finding great heaps of dead rats in all the waterfront sites but they just aren’t there.
“And all the evidence I’ve looked at suggests the plague spread too fast for the traditional explanation of transmission by rats and fleas,” he added. “It has to be person to person – there just isn’t time for the rats to be spreading it.”
Sloane added that he’s not even certain whether the disease was bubonic plague, as is believed by many.
Last week, yet another publicly funded study was unveiled in Columbia, this one by the University of South Carolina on business and employment.
The story that appeared in The State, like the study itself, left one with more questions than answers.
For instance, there was no indication of what the cost of the study was or who paid for it.
For that information, you’d have to turn to the article written by my colleague at The Nerve, Eric Ward. Ward reported Tuesday that the study cost $55,000 and that the partners in the study included the S.C. Department of Commerce, New Carolina and the CTC Public Benefit Corporation.
Nearly three-fourths of the $55,000 came from public sources, Ward reported.